In Fall 2018, LA Metro started quietly ramping down fare enforcement to near zero. This policy change cratered fare revenue and worsened onboard safety.
In summer 2025, we began organizing riders to demand the reinstatement of onboard fare checks.
In summer 2026, LA Metro agreed to begin a limited reintroduction of fare checks on select lines.
In collaboration with LA Metro, we're finally moving the needle and building a new foundation for a fare-required future.
LA Daily News Oct 8 2026
LA Metro's new faregates only cut evasion by 36%
CBS News Aug 18 2026
Could Metro become free for residents?
Monks & Merrill | KFI AM 640 Aug 21 2026
Metro Fare Enforcement
LAist | AirTalk Aug 12 2026
What would go into a 'fare-free' LA Metro system?
LAist Aug 12 2026
LA Mayor Bass wants public transit to be free...
404 by LA Times Jul 24 2026
IG📷 TT🎵 The Fight Over Metro Safety
City Journal Jul 1 2026
L.A. Metro Is a Crime-Ridden Hellscape*
*We don't agree with the framing of this story.
LAist | AirTalk Dec 8 2025
How is LA Metro enforcing ride fares? 🔊
LA Daily News Nov 16 2025
How LA Metro quietly stopped enforcing fares
The Metro San Gabriel Valley Service Council endorsed reinstatement of fare checks. Read their letter here.
Background
Here's the lore.
For most of LA Metro’s history, fare evasion rates were in the single digits (Pg 12) because Sheriff's Deputies (and later in-house Transit Security Officers) conducted regular proof of payment inspections on vehicles [source]. But then, under pressure from anti-fare activists, Metro began quietly phasing out enforcement. In fall 2018, the number of monthly fare checks plummeted from around 350k (source) to under 50k (source). Fares were then suspended from 2020 to 2022, and while fare collection resumed, LA Metro only did 5k checks per month in 2025 (Slide 3) and issued an average of just 8 citations per day (source). As a result, fare evasion had skyrocketed to roughly half of boardings (Metro estimate Slide 7) (Our estimate). And it's not a staffing issue. Before the pandemic, LA Metro had roughly 150 TSOs (Pg 75). Metro now has over 250. That's why we believe Metro can reinstate comprehensive fare enforcement with existing staff.
Metro DPS is finally listening.
In summer 2026, at our recommendation, Metro DPS began piloting fare checks on the G Line (Attachment A). Metro DPS has also begun a limited introduction of fare checks on select segments of the rail system. We applaud Metro DPS for taking this encouraging step forward and are currently gathering data to assess the results of this new enforcement activity.
In July 2026, Metro DPS did 32,247 fare checks, the highest level achieved since February 2020. This represents less than 10% of the monthly fare checks done in 2018, and most of the system is still de facto fare-optional. However, we see this limited rollout of enforcement pilots as the first step toward rebuilding Metro's fare collection capacity. The work isn't done, but we're getting there.
TSOs fare check G Line passengers at North Hollywood in September 2026
An anti-fare rally at Metro HQ featuring various local nonprofits.
A social media graphic posted by Karen Bass on July 24th 2026 touts her fare-free proposal.
We're up against a powerful, anti-fare lobby.
For decades, LA Metro has been under pressure from a lobbying network of anti-fare nonprofits. These groups successfully pushed Metro to stop inflation-adjusting fares after 2014 and stop enforcing fares after 2018, with the end goal of going fare-free.
When fares were suspended during the pandemic, Metro launched the Fareless System Initiative to investigate the feasibility of keeping Metro fare-free permanently. After taking a hard look, Metro staff determined that ending fares wasn't worth the losses in revenue, security and farebox-contingent formula funding.
Despite this history, on July 22nd 2026, LA Mayor Karen Bass announced plans to launch a second fareless initiative in her term as Metro Board chair. On August 13th, she added in an AirTalk interview that she opposes TSOs (Metro's designated fare enforcement personnel) doing fare checks.
In August 2026, we launched an effort to block Mayor Bass's free fare push. Mayor Bass then pivoted to a motion directing Metro staff to review the findings of the original Fareless System Initiative and develop a plan by December to increase fare discount enrollment by 30%.
We believe fare collection is an essential component of running a functional major transit system, and we stand ready to defend Metro's ability to collect fares.
"Okay, but why should I care about fare evasion?"
We're losing money that could improve service.
Since 2014, LA Metro's farebox recovery rate has dropped from roughly 25% to around 6% (source)(slide 52). This is because Metro stopped adjusting fares to inflation after 2014 and started phasing out fare enforcement after 2018. While growing sales tax revenues have been able to offset Metro's voluntary abandonment of fare collection, Metro could run more and better service if they began taking fare collection seriously again. We estimate that inflation adjusting and enforcing fares would bring in roughly $220M* more annually, enough to fund 13-15%** more bus service or bring back frequent rail service after 8:30pm.
Captured on member's commute
Optional fares are making LA Metro less safe.
In every LA Metro customer survey, the top issues are consistently cleanliness, safety and antisocial behavior. As of 2025, crimes against persons per million boardings are 60% higher (6.3) than in 2018 before the enforcement collapse (3.9) (source). We believe the collapse in enforcement is the main contributing factor, because as Metro revealed in 2024, 96% of violent crimes on Metro were committed by people without proof of payment (source). To make matters worse, DPS has also functionally suspended Code of Conduct enforcement, typically issuing fewer than 1 non-fare CoC citation per day (source). It's time to start enforcing the rules of the system again and create a onboard environment that respects customers' safety.
Everything that isn't fare enforcement.
Since we launched our campaign in 2025, Metro leadership has periodically pointed to a series of fare-compliance interventions other than fare checks. We believe these interventions are not productively moving the needle on fare compliance for the following reasons.
The new paddle gates are easy to piggyback through and can't be installed on buses or street level stations. In Oct 2026, we published an investigation of the faregates' effectiveness, finding they reduced evasion by 36% on average. We support their installation, but they will never come close to supplanting the need for human enforcement.
LAPD and LASD performing "visual TAP card checks" can't tell if riders paid because they don't have card scanners. Only the TSOs have them. That's because under the 2017 agreement, law enforcement isn't supposed to be doing fare checks.
TAP-to-Exit only works when TSOs are standing at the gates, and Metro will never have enough TSOs to babysit every turnstile and farebox in the system. But Metro does have enough TSOs to do comprehensive random fare checks.
An equitable LA Metro requires fare enforcement.
Right now, the real transportation barrier for low-income Angelenos isn't a $1.75 fare; it's a transit system that doesn't respect the safety or comfort of its riders and isn't collecting the funds needed to operate adequate service levels. Metro riders making under $58,300 a year already get 20 free rides a month under the LIFE program, and fare citations are adjudicated as a $75 civil fine leaving no criminal record (with a community service option for those who can't afford the fine). LA Metro already has the infrastructure for thoughtful, compassionate fare enforcement. They just stopped using it.
Most riders support fare enforcement.
In surveys, LA Metro riders strongly favor increased security and existing fare collection initiatives, and even put security and cleanliness as higher priorities than actual transit operations (source). In June 2018, right before the fare enforcement collapse, 31% of respondents said there were "too few" fare checkers, 54% said "right amount" and only 14% said there were "too many" (source). And in 2021, at the height of anti-police sentiment, 66% of riders supported more armed security on LA Metro (attachment E). For years, riders have been demanding a security and fare enforcement system that actually works, and Metro has responded by destroying that system from the inside. But it's not too late to make things right.
Here's what we want.
We want LA Metro to bring back onboard fare inspections on the rail system using their existing force of over 250 TSOs, setting a modest starting goal to check 20,000 passengers a day (117 per TSO shift). To make mass fare enforcement viable on buses, we propose that LA Metro convert buses to a proof-of-payment system as Muni has done in San Francisco, and make a dedicated effort to improve the reliability of Metro's notoriously unreliable back door TAP readers. Lastly, because LA Metro has not adjusted fares for inflation in 12 years, we propose that once Metro reestablishes fare compliance, fares should be increased to $2.25, $2.50 and continuously adjusted with inflation thereafter. The greatest transit systems of this country and the world got where they are by running good service, charging appropriately priced fares to pay for it and keeping the system secure. That's what Metro used to do, and we believe it's not too late to get back on track.
Our case for fare enforcement in video:
One of our members made a video explaining our campaign. This video was created before LA Metro began a limited implementation of fare enforcement.
Riders can take back control.
Most transit riders (and voters) want an LA Metro that focuses on service and safety first, is fiscally responsible and enforces rules. But for years, the nonprofits that claim to represent those riders have pushed Metro's agenda in the exact opposite direction. It's time for the majority of transit riders to take back the microphone and refocus Metro on transit polices that actually work. It's time for LA County's leaders to treat Metro like a workhorse of our transportation system, not a testing ground for counterproductive policy experiments. It's time to bring transit industry best practices back to Los Angeles, and build a positive vision for a fare-required future.